000			03291nam a22004095i 4500
999			_c10318 _d10318
001			10318
003			DE-He213
005			20210608040358.0
006			a||||fo|||| 00| 0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			180117s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319693361
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-69336-1 _2doi
040			_aES-MaUEC _bspa _dES-VaUE
050		4	_aD250 .D44 _b2018 EB
100	1		_aDeer Richardson, Linda _eautor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245	1	0	_aAcademic Theories of Generation in the Renaissance: _bThe Contemporaries and Successors of Jean Fernel (1497-1558) _cby Linda Deer Richardson, Benjamin Goldberg.
264		1	_aCham _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer _c2018.
300			_a1 recurso en línea (XXXI, 301 páginas 11 ilustraciones)
336			_2rdacontent _aTexto (visual) _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aelectrónico _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _arecurso electrónico _bcr
347			_atext file _bPDF
490	0		_aHistory, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, _x2211-1948 ; _v22
490	0		_aMedicine (Springer-11650)
520	3		_aThis volume deals with philosophically grounded theories of animal generation as found in two different traditions: one, deriving primarily from Aristotelian natural philosophy and specifically from his Generation of Animals; and another, deriving from two related medical traditions, the Hippocratic and the Galenic. The book contains a classification and critique of works that touch on the history of embryology and animal generation written before 1980. It also contains translations of key sections of the works on which it is focused. It looks at two different scholarly communities: the physicians (medici) and philosophers (philosophi), that share a set of textual resources and philosophical lineages, as well as a shared problem (explaining animal generation), but that nevertheless have different concerns and commitments. The book demonstrates how those working in these two traditions not only shared a common philosophical background in the arts curricula of the universities, but were in constant intercourse with each other. This book presents a test case of how scholarly communities differentiate themselves from each other through methods of argument, empirical investigation, and textual interpretations. It is all the more interesting because the two communities under investigation have so much in common and yet, in the end, are distinct in a number of important ways.
988			_aEBSPRINGER_2018
650		7	_aHistoria moderna _yS.XVII _9667058 _2embne
700	1		_aGoldberg, Benjamin _eautor _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no00081009 _0http://viaf.org/viaf/66422057
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service) _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2005046756 _0http://viaf.org/viaf/148105729 _9106996
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9783319693347
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9783319693354
776	0	8	_iEdición impresa: _z9783319887579
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69336-1 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Valencia)
942			_2lcc _cLE
998			_db _feng _ggw _h0