000			02741nam a22003135i 4500
001			239448
003			ES-VaUE
005			20240306114328.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			210205s2021 sz | o |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783030603922
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-030-60392-2 _2doi
040			_aES-VaU _bspa _cES-VaU _dES-VaU
050		4	_aT57.6-.97 _b2021 EB
100	1		_aMunier, Nolberto. _eautor. _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245	0	0	_aUses and Limitations of the AHP Method : _bA Non-Mathematical and Rational Analysis _cby Nolberto Munier, Eloy Hontoria
250			_a1st ed. 2021.
264		1	_aCham _c2021 _bSpringer International Publishing
300			_a1 recurso en línea
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aelectrónico _bc _2rdamedia
338			_arecurso electrónico _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aManagement for Professionals _x2192-810X
505	0		_aChapter 1: General Concepts -- Chapter 2: The Hierarchical Structure -- Chapter 3: Complex Scenarios -- Chapter 4: Rationality of the AHP Method -- Chapter 5: Shortcomings of the AHP Method -- Chapter 6: The Need for Improvement the MCDM Modeling -- Chapter 7: Final Remarks and Conclusion on AHP/ANP Inability for Solving Complex Scenarios -- Glossary -- References.
520			_aThis book examines the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, its varied uses, as well as its limitations for solving real-world scenarios. While the simplicity of the method compels users to find shortcuts to a real-world problem, it also leads to obtaining wrong results that do not represent reality. By alerting practitioners about the core necessities of a new scenario, this book helps solve this problem, as well as contribute to the field of Multicriteria Decision Making Method (MDCM). The authors use a demonstrative, rather than a theoretical approach, and examine 30 subjects that displays the shortcomings and drawbacks of the AHP. Each one is examined in-depth, discussed, debated and reasoned, using examples, some of them numeric. The book highlights the rationality and common sense of the subjects, and in most cases, validates the criticism by showing through numerical examples, the impossibility of the AHP method to address, let alone solve real-world projects. At the conclusion of each subject, a table is built comparing the similarities and differences between the opinions of the authors and other experts, along with the respective pros and cons.
856	4	0	_uhttps://go.openathens.net/redirector/universidadeuropea.es?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60392-2 _zAcceso a este recurso digital (usuarios Universidad Europea de Valencia)
942			_2lcc _cLE
988			_aSpringer_Business_2021
999			_c239448 _d239448